High Court Asked To Clear Up Differing ‘Autodialer’ Definitions

A gym chain that allegedly used an “autodialer” to send texts to customers in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act has asked the Supreme Court to decide whether the Ninth Circuit erred by expanding the definition of “autodialer” to revive a putative class action against the company…

Read this piece in its entirety at Law360.

Comments

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s